Monthly Archives: January 2010

4Q Corporate Revenues

I have been looking at the revenue figures posted for a variety of diversified manufacturers and distributors.  These are well-respected, S&P500 firms.

One would expect these firms to be posting decent revenue gains, especially as compared to the very weak year-ago period (4Q2008).  Additionally, these firms stand to benefit from the prevailing economic climate due to their size, global sales, high accessibility to credit at favorable terms, access to stimulus business, etc.  In essence, whatever general economic strength is existent, and then some, should certainly be reflected in their revenues.

Instead of strong or at least a decent 4Q 2009 revenue results, most of these companies are reporting continued percentage sales declines when compared to year-ago results.  These declines have ranged in value but are significantly negative, with some being double-digit declines.

This result is not significantly better than the similar comparisons that I have previously  commented upon for 3Q2009 results.

This lack of revenue growth is very notable and has many implications.  It seems to at least partially belie claims of economic recovery.  As well, it would explain why (net) hiring is rather nonexistent.

Of course, there are other implications as well.  Among these implications is that the lack of revenue growth weakens any fundamental valuation one may choose to assign to the stocks of these companies.

back to <home>

SPX at 1091.38 as this post is written

The State of the Union Address – A Few Comments

I found plenty of noteworthy comments in last night’s State of the Union Address.   Here is the link to the transcript:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-state-union-address

Here are a couple of my thoughts:

First, many stimulus initiatives were mentioned.  Some of these were new ideas.  That stimulus ideas are proliferating should not be a surprise, as many in our country believe they represent a sensible solution to our many economic difficulties.   I will comment on many of these initiatives when more details are available and/or they are enacted.  For now, I will say that before we, as a nation, enact more stimulus bills, we need to analyze the results of the many stimulus efforts previously and currently enacted.  Then, we need to assess the unintended consequences and risks these stimulus efforts hold, of which I have previously mentioned on this blog.

Second, the employment situation was mentioned.  This, of course, is not a surprise and is a very popular topic among all politicians – and for very good reason.

President Obama during the speech last night made the following comment:

“But the truth is, these steps won’t make up for the seven million jobs that we’ve lost over the last two years.”

I believe that our unemployment problems, both current and ongoing, encompass a population many multiples of seven million.   Our unemployment problems will most likely not be solved by any easily enacted solution, unfortunately.

For those unaware, I previously wrote a series of blog posts on unemployment, can be found here:

https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/07/24/why-arent-companies-hiring/

back to <home>

SPX at 1086.85 as this post is written

Roubini Interview Concerning Bubbles

Here is a link to an interview today with Nouriel Roubini in which he discusses bubbles:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/35078010

I would argue against those who believe that bubbles could start to form or that they are just beginning to form.  I strongly believe that there are many bubbles in existence right now, and the implications of such are massive.

Over the last few months I have written quite a few posts on bubbles, and those posts can be found on in the “Bubbles” category listed on the right-hand side of the home page.

back to <home>

SPX at 1090.18 as this post is written

Article On Strategic Defaults

I ran across this article from U.S. News & World Report, dated 1/19/10 concerning “strategic defaults”:

The article is interesting in that it summarizes various facets of the “strategic default” situation and presents an interesting example of the dynamics that one “underwater” homeowner faces. 

I have mentioned “strategic defaults” on numerous occasions.  It is a very important “wildcard” in the residential real estate equation.

back to <home>

SPX at 1097.60 as this post is written

Political Volatility

Over the last few years the political scene has become more volatile, swinging from heavily Republican to heavily Democratic.  Now, it appears as if the political volatility is increasing yet again, with the recent election of Scott Brown and the unexpected hurdles Ben Bernanke is facing during his reconfirmation.  Many incumbents (and political appointees) who until recently seemed to hold “safe” positions may well find themselves open to losing elections.

Many would view this increased volatility as a positive sign the political system is “working.”  Of course there is credence to this view.

However, from an economics perspective, there are other consequences as well.  The implications are potentially vast. 

Desperate politicians may well feel an increased need to “do something” to prove that they are mindful of, and acting upon, our economic problems.  “Doing something” about our economic problems often entails some type of intervention or other variant of spending money.  As we have seen, the size of these interventions is often implied to denote their worthiness, with larger interventions purportedly more beneficial than smaller ones.  When one listens to politicians speak of their intervention legislations, it almost seems as if they view large interventions as a “badge of honor.”

I have written extensively about interventions, and will continue to do so.  They are very much misunderstood.  Of particular concern is that as time goes on and our financial problems grow in size, there has been a growing insensitivity to the ever-increasing size of the interventions.  Whereas just a couple of years ago a $150 Billion intervention would seem large, now that same size of intervention would be considered small.

While I have previously written that  interventions would continue, it is important to understand what factors are driving the trend.

back to <home>

SPX at 1102.00 as this post is written

The Global Economic Situation

On this blog, I have maintained a focus on the U.S. economy.  I have done so for a variety of reasons, many of which are explained in this June 21 2009 post:

https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/06/21/the-global-economic-future/

Additionally, from a practical perspective, from a time standpoint it would be prohibitive to attempt to comment on all global economic affairs that I consider relevant.

Although I focus on the U.S. economic condition, this is not meant to imply that the U.S. is the only country that faces an array of difficult economic challenges.  Much to the contrary – many countries currently face economic issues that are exceedingly problematical. 

It is very troubling that so many countries, especially those with large economies, are concurrently experiencing such difficulties.  Such a common and unified adverse condition will not bode well assuming severe economic weakness reappears.

Attaining Sustainable Prosperity is a global challenge.

back to <home>

SPX at 1140.78 as this post is written

My Thoughts On Our Current Economic Situation

I would like to provide an overall update as to my thoughts on our current economic situation.

My blog post of September 1, 2009 summarizes my current thoughts well.  It can be found here:

https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/09/01/are-we-going-into-a-depression/

Many of my concerns and reasons for such an outlook have been expressed in this blog. 

Of course, over the last few months there have been signs of economic recovery – or at least a lessening of economic weakness.  However, I believe that these signs represent the type of intermittent economic strength that is often seen during periods of prolonged economic weakness.

back to <home>

SPX at 1141.69 as this post is written

The January Wall Street Journal Economic Forecast Survey

Here is the link to the latest (January) Wall Street Journal Economic Forecast Survey:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704363504575002700724430016.html

As seen in the survey details, there hasn’t been much change in expectations concerning full-year 2010 GDP or the Unemployment Rate for many months.  The average expectation is for a full-year GDP of 3.0% and Unemployment Rate for December 2010 of 9.5%.

Also, the economists put a 16% chance “that the economy will enter another recession in 2010.”

back to <home>

SPX at 1148.46 as this post is written

The US Dollar – A Few Comments

On December 17, I commented on the US Dollar, especially in the context of the US Dollar carry trade. 

Today, I would like to make a few overall comments about the US Dollar.  Here is a weekly chart of the US Dollar from 2000, with the MACD and CCI indicators shown above the price plot:

Chart courtesy of Stockcharts.com

I have also included a few trendlines shown in blue and red.  As one can see, at the present price of 77.02, the USD is near the bottom of the price range of the last 10 years.

Many people, especially those of the “hard money” and “Austrian” philosophies, have long held that many of the actions we (as a nation) have been taking to combat our current period of economic weakness would unduly pressure the dollar.  These actions have included very low interest rates, truly outsized interventions (including “money printing”) and deficit spending.

So far, as can be seen on the chart, the US Dollar has “held in there”, most likely for a variety of reasons.

It should be very interesting to watch the US Dollar from here.  Although there appears to be few, if any, signs that a severe US Dollar decline is impending, as stated above many of the actions we have been taking (and will most likely continue to take) are certainly cause for concern when viewed in context of US Dollar strength.

The strength of the US Dollar is of paramount importance, because (of course) perhaps the fastest and most assured way of getting into severe economic trouble is to have rapid currency depreciation.

back to <home>

SPX at 1136.22 as this post is written

Three Unemployment Charts

Occasionally, I have posted charts concerning unemployment.  With Friday’s unemployment release, here are three charts that I find noteworthy:

First, from the St. Louis Fed site, the Median Duration of Unemployment. 

Second, from the CalculatedRisk blog of 1/8/10, Unemployed Over 26 Weeks:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/

Third, again from the CalculatedRisk blog of 1/8/10 – I like this chart as it presents a relative depiction of Post WWII recession job losses.  As one can see, our current period of economic weakness’s job losses are outsized both in duration and severity:

As depicted by these charts, our unemployment problem is severe.  Unfortunately, there does not appear to be any “easy” solutions.

A few months ago I wrote a series of blog posts titled “Why Aren’t Companies Hiring?” which can be found at this link:

https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/07/24/why-arent-companies-hiring/

back to <home>

SPX at 1141.18 as this post is written