Archive for the ‘Investor’ Category

The Stock Market – Continued Weakness?

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

With the ongoing problems in Europe, fears of worldwide economic “contagion”, and many overt signs of economic slowing in the United States, one is led to wonder how susceptible the U.S. stock markets are to further declines.

While I have written extensively about how I believe the stock market will face an exceedingly large decline in the future, for now, I think (based upon a variety of factors) that a near-term stock market advance is likely.  This is not to say that I think “all is well” with the economy or the markets – anything but.   In essence, I think we will see a little more “sunshine” but if one looks out to the (economic/financial) horizon “the sky is black,” unfortunately.

One item that I have found interesting is that during the latest stock market decline (from the 1219 peak in April), while the VIX shot up significantly, the 3-month Treasury Bill stayed stable.  Although this is certainly not a “guaranteed confirmation” of any type, I find it notable and positive for the markets and economy for the short-term.  Below is a daily chart from 2008 showing the 3-month Treasury rate vs. the VIX and S&P500 (with a 50-day moving average line in blue):

chart courtesy of StockCharts.com

As I wrote on May 19, “I believe that we are building to a variety of major market events.”  I plan on elaborating upon this in the near future.

back to <home>

SPX at 1075.73 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

S&P500 Earnings Estimates For 2010 & 2011

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

As many are aware, Standard & Poors publishes earnings estimates on a quarterly basis.

Currently, their estimates for 2010 add to the following:

-From a “bottoms up” perspective, operating earnings of $81.72/share

-From a “top down” perspective, operating earnings of $71.32/share

-From a “top down” perspective, “as reported” earnings of $64.84/share

Currently, their estimates for 2011 add to the following:

-From a “bottoms up” perspective, operating earnings of $94.88/share

-From a “top down” perspective, operating earnings of $78.40/share

-From a “top down” perspective, “as reported” earnings of $80.92/share

As I commented in the December 20, 2009 post, coming into 2010 the overall consensus on S&P500 earnings for the year seemed to be in the $75 range.

_____

I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this blog are aware, I do not agree with the many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.

back to <home>

SPX at 1089.41 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

“From Bubble To Bubble To Bubble”

Friday, May 28th, 2010

I ran across the following weekly S&P500 chart and comment from Maurice Walker, of thechartpatterntrader.com at StockCharts.com.  Although I do not necessarily agree with all of the chart’s annotations and the accompanying commentary, I definitely think that both are worthy of contemplation:

chart courtesy of StockCharts.com

(one can click on the chart to enlarge the image)

Maurice Walker’s accompanying comment:

“The Keynesian Cure Never Works

The US had a massive malinestment (An investment in wrong lines which leads to capital losses. Malinvestment results from the inability of investors to foresee correctly, at the time of investment) in housing induced by affordable housing mandates, easy money from the Fed, and Fannie and Freddie guaranteeing mortgages that they had no business guaranteeing.

You cannot get over a debt infused recession with more debt. You have to work off the malinvestment. This is why the Keynesian cure never works. Just look at Greece.

But instead of working off the malivestment, we are trying reinflate the housing bubble with more spending. We are trying to reinflate the economic bubble with the stimulus package.

The Fed has to keep pressing the accelerator faster and faster to main tain the same simulative effect. But if the keep doing this it will cause inflation to arise. Additionally, the Fed already engineered a runaway expansion of the monetary base, that will generate explosive inflation. The borrowing needs of Obama’s record-shattering deficits will only exacerbate the effect. We are moving from a housing bubble to a government debt bubble that is going to ultimately collapse the dollar.”

_____

back to <home>

SPX at 1092.58 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

“Bubble Investing”

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

I recently saw an ad for “Bubble Investing” and thought it was notable.  It used to be that the mere idea of an asset bubble led to concern.  Now, it appears as if asset bubbles are seen by many as more of an opportunity than a threat.

Of course, investing in bubbles can be profitable.  As I wrote in the December 3, 2009 post, “Investing in bubbles can be extremely profitable on the way up; however, for the “long” investor they can produce huge losses if one doesn’t time the exit appropriately.”  History has shown that the (vast) majority of investors don’t time the exit appropriately.

While I have extensively written of how problematical the asset bubble situation is today, it should be noted that others have written to the contrary.   The April 25 2010 post concerning work by Frederic Mishkin and an April 27 article by James Picerno are two prominent examples.

back to <home>

SPX at 1085.04 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

Stock Market Volatility

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

As seen in the chart below, the 50 day moving average (as seen in blue) for the VIX is now trending higher.  This is the first time since March 2009 in which it has done so in a significant manner:

chart courtesy of StockCharts.com

Of course, there are many different ways to measure volatility.  Other measures are showing a significant increase as well.

I expect there to be significant, and steadily increasing (relative to the past 15 months) volatility going forward.  This will be seen in both up and down price movements.

This volatility is being caused by a variety of factors.

I believe that we are building to a variety of major market events.  I will be elaborating upon this shortly.

back to <home>

SPX at 1116.65 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

Thoughts On The May 6 Stock Market Plunge

Monday, May 10th, 2010

I find last Thursday’s stock market plunge to be highly notable on several fronts.  The temptation is to treat the event as a “fluke” or “one off” event that is inconsequential; it is especially tempting to do so when most of the damage was quickly reversed and, as of this writing, stock indices are again climbing.

There is no official report yet about the causes and effects of Thursday’s plunge.  Aside from the main question as to what caused the plunge, I think that the following questions are paramount and also deserve recognition:

  • Is technology a “culprit” in the affair or is it working like it should?
  • Does this stock market plunge belie the widely held (and “common sense”) assumption that these stock markets are immensely “liquid”?
  • What trades should be “broken” and why?
  • Is the current stock market “system” one that has a great deal of inherent “integrity” – both structurally and ethically?
  • Are rules and regulators “behind the (technology) curve” as widely speculated?
  • Will further rules, regulations, and “trading curbs” make a similar future occurrence more or less likely?
  • Will the exact cause of the plunge ever be determined?
  • Can the exact cause of the the plunge be determined?
  • Does the plunge nullify the idea, held by some, that markets are “efficient”?

There are countless other questions that can be added to the above list.  Needless to say, I think the plunge has great significance and to summarily dismiss it, as many appear to have done, is a mistake.

________

I wrote of my concerns about high-frequency trading and the stock market about four weeks prior to Thursday’s plunge.

back to <home>

SPX at 1110.88 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

1Q 2010 Corporate Revenues

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

For the last few quarters, I have been commenting upon the general lack of revenue growth in corporate results.  I have focused on a variety of diversified manufacturers and distributors, all of them well-respected S&P500 firms.    My last comment on this issue was on January 29.

For the recently released 1Q2010 financial results, it is hard to generalize the revenue growth or lack thereof.   Some companies have been posting seemingly strong, double-digit growth, but this has been against weak year-ago results.  It appears that many of the firms that have the strongest revenue growth have achieved this growth via sales to the Asia region.

It will be interesting to monitor these revenue growth figures going forward.  Revenue growth during our current period of economic weakness is a key issue, and generally lacks recognition, especially compared to earnings growth and whether companies are matching or beating earnings “expectations.”

back to <home>

SPX at 1173.6 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

The S&P500 And Chinese Stock Market

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Over the last few months a notable divergence has occurred between the U.S. and Chinese stock markets.

Two charts illustrate this divergence.  The first shows the S&P500 vs. the Shanghai Composite on a daily basis:

chart courtesy of StockCharts.com

The second chart shows a chart of FXI, the iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index.  This chart is from chartoftheday.com of 4/30/10.  One can see the flagging momentum:

It is notable that the Shanghai Composite led the SPX (S&P500) significantly in late ’08 – early ’09, yet it has been stagnant- to-declining lately.

I find this divergence in the SPX and Chinese stock markets to be curious and cautionary.  Many companies in the S&P500 are deriving the vast majority of any current revenue growth – not to mention earnings – from overseas, particularly Asia.  Given this scenario, it seems strange that the SPX is significantly outperforming the Chinese stock market.

back to <home>

SPX at 1193.6 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

More Ponzi Schemes

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

The Wall Street Journal has recently had two more articles concerning alleged Ponzi schemes.

The first is titled “Our Ponzi Nation: Florida Entrepreneur Hit With Charges.”

The second is titled “Alleged Ponzi In Colorado Has Shades of Madoff Affair.”

Also, there was an interesting story from April 17 titled “Report Says SEC Missed Many Shots At Stanford.”

I have been intermittently commenting about the growing number of investment frauds being uncovered.  Ponzi Schemes, although seemingly common, are just one form of investment fraud.

The main question remains how much investment fraud is still undiscovered?  As I commented in the March 7 post, “…I would say that there is much investment fraud still “out there” (i.e. yet to be uncovered) and the true figure will likely prove to be eye-popping.”

As well, I believe there are significant amounts of other fraud types still undiscovered, such as that at the corporate level.  This corporate fraud includes corporate accounting misrepresentation.  Of course, Enron remains the most famous example of corporate accounting fraud.

back to <home>

SPX at 1186.69 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark

Home Prices Vs. Gold

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

On April 23, chartoftheday.com had an interesting chart, shown below, that compares the median home price vs. the price of Gold:

Traditionally, houses have been viewed as “hard assets.”  However, as one can see above, their recent (from a long-term historical perspective) price pattern seems more geared to that of a “paper asset” – i.e. strong performance during the ’80s and ’90s, while significantly underperforming Gold for roughly 7 years.

There are many other observations and interpretations that can be made from this ratio as well.  It certainly “frames” home prices in a different light, especially from an investment standpoint.

Going forward, it will be interesting to see how this ratio evolves…

________

My previous posts on Gold can be found under the “Gold” tag.

back to <home>

SPX at 1189.38 as this post is written

  • Share/Bookmark