Posts Tagged ‘Intervention’

My Thoughts on More Stimulus, Part II

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Perhaps one of the first questions that should be asked with regard to our current economic difficulties is “Do we Understand the Problem?”  I discussed this concept in the article “President Obama’s Greatest Challenge” (listed here as the fourth article):

http://www.economicgreenfield.com/prosperitybypencom-directory/

Do we understand the problem?  I will leave that question unanswered, for now.  However, some aspects to consider:

  1. We seem to continually underestimate the complexity and/or severity of our economic situation in that each stimulus is billed as the “solution” to our problems, yet each fails to stem further economic weakness.   This problem has occurred with the $150 billion tax rebate stimulus in 2008; TARP in 2008, and now, based upon results vs. plan (to date), The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
  2. As mentioned in yesterday’s post, “An Interesting Chart on Job Losses,” the length and severity of this purported recession are outsized, on a historical basis, despite the very large aggregate intervention steps taken.
  3. There is widely varying conclusions as to the effect of the $787 Billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  As mentioned in this Wall Street Journal article (which does a good job of summarizing the current calls for more stimulus): 
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124692229711302683.html ”Depending on your perspective, the stimulus plan:
    a. Isn’t working.
    b. Is preventing unemployment from being even worse, or
    c. Hasn’t had enough time to really kick in yet.”
  4. The rather disconcerting reality that despite official large-scale interventions (including stimulus plans) since at least mid-2007, the economy is, at best, not getting any worse.  But as mentioned in the following Wall Street Journal editorial,

    “The real question is how strong and sustained any expansion will be. If the “stimulus” were working as advertised, it ought to be very strong.”

  5. Add to this list an array of disturbing economic statistics and other “outlier” behavior that I have previously discussed. 

As listed above, as well as for other reasons, there is much to consider when one attempts to answer the question “Do we understand the problem?” 

Part III to follow…

SPX at 880.38 as this post is written

 

Copyright 2009 by Ted Kavadas

  • Share/Bookmark

An Interesting Chart on Job Losses

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

I ran across the following chart from chartoftheday.com, and found it interesting:

http://www.chartoftheday.com/20090703.htm?T

As one can see, the current degree of job losses is rather atypical.

I would also like to highlight another issue as well.  From a historical perspective, this (purported) recession, that the NBER has classified as having started in December 2007, is getting “long in the tooth” from a historical perspective.  The following blog post does a good job of summarizing how long recessions typically last:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/update-what-is-depression.html

As one can see, from a historical standpoint the severity of the job losses, as well as the length of this (purported) recession are atypical.  Both have persevered in the face of very large amounts of intervention, including stimulus efforts.   

As I have written about previously, the above is yet more evidence that we may well be in a “new (economic) environment” – with the associated implications…   

SPX at 883.05 as this post is written

 

Copyright 2009 by Ted Kavadas

  • Share/Bookmark

Article of Note on the Foreclosure Crisis

Monday, July 6th, 2009

I found the following article to be of interest.  It is titled “New Evidence on the Foreclosure Crisis” and is found in The Wall Street Journal, p A13, July 3-5, at this link:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124657539489189043.html

While I can’t verify his analysis, the article is worth reading.

I don’t agree with all of his conclusions, especially his remark that housing prices are likely to stop declining soon.  

However, his analysis and other conclusions are important in that they further support the idea that many of the policy efforts currently enacted to mitigate the foreclosure problem may be misdirected.  

It is important to remember that much of the total intervention effort is aimed toward averting further weakness in residential real estate.

SPX at 888.65 as this post is written

 

Copyright 2009 by Ted Kavadas

  • Share/Bookmark

Redefaults

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

This was an interesting editorial in The Wall Street Journal a few days ago concerning the “redefault” rate:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124338503008056785.html

These statistics are problematical, especially if one believes the economy will stagnate or worsen from this juncture.

It also raises the question as to the effectiveness of intervention measures on default rates and housing prices.  Many of the current interventions are geared toward stemming foreclosures, either directly or indirectly.

For those who have not yet seen it, David H. Smith has put together a Household Initiative Plan, found here:

http://householdinitiativeplan.blogspot.com/

I find it appealing in many regards; perhaps chief among them is that it promotes the idea of having homeowners spend their own money on their own real estate, instead of solely relying on government bailouts and interventions to assist financially troubled homowners. 

In ways it’s akin to the investment idea of investors having ”skin in the game.”

I’ll be commenting a lot more on real estate on a going-forward basis, given its importance and that there are a lot of complicated dynamics in that market.

  • Share/Bookmark

10-year Treasury Yield

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

It is interesting that there has been relatively little commentary on the increase of the 10-year Treasury yield.  

In my opinion the rise is significant in many ways.  Perhaps chief among them is the fact that the yield has risen sharply (to a current 3.46%) despite a large-scale intervention designed to bring yields lower.   This divergence is significant because it raises the question as to whether we are witnessing a failed intervention.  While it is probably too early to classify it as such (due to, among other things, the fact that there is likely to be more purchases) perhaps the word “errant” might be more appropriate at this juncture.  At any rate, the increase in yields bears close watching.

Upon originally hearing of the intervention plans to purchase Treasury and Mortgage Backed Securities in order to bring rates down, I thought the plan was flawed in many fashions, both theoretical and practical.

For those unaware, I have previously written an article that discusses the hidden risks and unintended consequences of interventions; it can be found here:

http://www.prosperitybypen.com/art-intervention.html

  • Share/Bookmark