Posts Tagged ‘unemployment rate’

U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Reference Charts As Of February 3, 2012

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.”

Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.

For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective.  Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site.  The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) defined as:

Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.

Here is the U-3 chart, currently showing a 8.3% unemployment rate:

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts updated as of 2-3-12)

-

Here is the U-6 chart, currently showing a 15.1% unemployment rate:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1344.90 as this post is written

Share

U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Reference Charts As Of January 6, 2012

Monday, January 9th, 2012

Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.”

Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.

For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective.  Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site.  The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) defined as:

Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.

Here is the U-3 chart, currently showing a 8.5% unemployment rate:

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts updated as of 1-6-12)

-

Here is the U-6 chart, currently showing a 15.2% unemployment rate:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1277.81 as this post is written

Share

U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Reference Charts As Of December 2 2011

Monday, December 5th, 2011

Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.”

Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.

For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective.  Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site.  The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) defined as:

Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.

Here is the U-3 chart, currently showing a 8.6% unemployment rate:

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts updated as of 12-2-11)

-

Here is the U-6 chart, currently showing a 15.6% unemployment rate:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1244.28 as this post is written

Share

U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Reference Charts As Of November 4 2011

Monday, November 7th, 2011

Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.”

Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.

For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective.  Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site.  The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) defined as:

Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.

Here is the U-3 chart, currently showing a 9.0% unemployment rate:

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts updated as of 11-4-11)

-

Here is the U-6 chart, currently showing a 16.2% unemployment rate:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1253.23 as this post is written

Share

U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Reference Charts

Sunday, October 9th, 2011

Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.”

Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.

For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective.  Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site.  The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) defined as:

Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.

Here is the U-3 chart, showing a 9.1% unemployment rate:

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts updated as of 10-7-11)

-

Here is the U-6 chart, showing a 16.5% unemployment rate:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1155.46 as this post is written

Share

Two Unemployment Charts

Monday, November 9th, 2009

The following chart is from the CalculatedRISK blog of November 8 http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/11/summary-and-look-ahead.html

I like this chart as it presents a relative depiction of Post WWII recession job losses.  As one can see, our current period of economic weakness’s job losses are outsized both in duration and severity:

CR Employment during Recessions 11-6-09

Here is a long-term view of the official stated Unemployment Rate.  This chart is from the St. Louis Federal Reserve site.  I find this chart interesting for many reasons.  As one can see, our current official Unemployment Rate (U3) is second only to that of the early 80′s.  Also, one can see that although large spikes up in the Unemployment Rate are relatively common, in prior periods the spikes up were (relatively) quickly followed by a quick retreat:

UNRATE_11-6-09

I have written frequently about the Unemployment situation.  These blog posts can be found under the “Unemployment” Category.  For those interested, here are a couple of the latest posts:

http://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/10/30/another-note-on-unemployment-statistics/

http://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/10/06/a-note-about-unemployment-statistics/

Furthermore, I wrote a blog series titled “Why Aren’t Companies Hiring?” that can be found listed on the Blog Series page here:

http://www.economicgreenfield.com/blog-series/

SPX at 1079.79 as this post is written

Share

Another Note On Unemployment Statistics

Friday, October 30th, 2009

On October 6 I wrote about my thoughts regarding Unemployment Statistics.  That link can be found here:

http://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/10/06/a-note-about-unemployment-statistics/

I recently ran across the following from John Mauldin, found in his October 23 “Thoughts From The Frontline” newsletter:

“With 9.8% unemployment, 7% underemployed (temporary), and another 3-4% off the radar screen because they are so discouraged they are not even looking for jobs, and thus are not counted as unemployed (who made up these rules?) …”

______

There are numerous aspects of the Unemployment situation that I find highly noteworthy.  If one assumes that the “true” Unemployment Rate is 20%, as per above, that in itself is outsized from a historical perspective.  One would have to look back to the worst period(s) of The Great Depression to see such (stated) Unemployment Rates.

Also, for all of the hardship this unemployment situation is causing, it doesn’t seem to be causing undue concern or focus.  Perhaps the vast majority has adopted the traditional view, one that economists routinely site, that Unemployment is a lagging indicator and thus the problem will improve as the purported economic recovery progresses.

Another facet of note is that the stock market valuation seems incredibly high when compared to the Unemployment Rate.  While this dichotomy may last temporarily, I would expect a definite “resolution” to close the gap. 

 
SPX at 1057.71 as this post is written
Share

A Note About Unemployment Statistics

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

From time to time, I will write posts that contain the Unemployment Rate or various other job loss measures.  I show these statistics as they are widely used and quoted by others. 

From my perspective, however, the methodology used to measure the various job loss and unemployment statistics does not provide an accurate depiction.  There are a variety of reasons for this that become evident if one carefully analyzes the unemployment calculations.

I feel that if one were to accurately gauge the Unemployment Rate, the rate would be at least 20%, which is roughly double the official Unemployment Rate of 9.8%.  This 20% figure is above the U6 measure of 17% that many have adopted as an accurate benchmark. 

What is bothersome is that even the official unemployment statistics that I show in the blog posts display a very worrisome situation.

 

SPX at 1054.65 as this post is written

Share

Debunking A Popular Phrase

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

One of the phrases that I have heard innumerable times is that our current period of economic weakness “isn’t as bad as The Great Depression because during The Great Depression unemployment was at 25%.”

While I have commented repeatedly on this blog that I don’t believe we should be equating our current economic condition to that of The Great Depression, I would like to comment on the phrase above.

As one can see on the chart found in this The Economist article:

http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13856176

the unemployment rate during The Great Depression peaked at 25%.  Also of note is the steady yet unrelenting climb in the rate leading to this peak.

Another issue that would need to be factored into any discussion of the two periods’ unemployment rates is that of comparibility.  While I haven’t seen any well-documented analysis of the methods used during each period, the prevailing wisdom appears to be that our current unemployment rate is understated vs. that used during The Great Depression. 

As I have stated previously on this blog, (on the “Why Aren’t Companies Hiring?” series that started on July 24) ”The unemployment issue currently facing the country is severe and complex.”  It is important that we keep it in proper historical context.

SPX at 1005.73 as this post is written

Share