Posts Tagged ‘current economic situation’

Recession Measures – Updated

Monday, October 31st, 2011

This post is the latest update to a series of blog posts seen on the CalculatedRisk.com blog.  The original blog post of April 12, 2010, is titled “Recession Measures.” In it, Bill discussed key measures that the NBER uses to determine recoveries, and posted four charts.

Here are those charts, updated in his October 30, 2011 post titled “Recovery Measures.”  The charts are constructed in a fashion different than most – in a “percent of peak” fashion.  As defined, “The following graphs are all constructed as a percent of the peak in each indicator.  This shows when the indicator has bottomed – and when the indicator has returned to the level of the previous peak.  If the indicator is at a new peak, the value is 100%.”  Periods of recession, as defined by the NBER, are shown as blue bars.

Here are the four charts, updated through the dates shown: (click on images to enlarge)

Real Gross Domestic Product, now back to the pre-recession peak:

-

Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments, still 5.3% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Industrial Production, still 6.5% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Payroll Employment, still 4.8% below the pre-recession peak:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1285.08 as this post is written

Share

Recession Measures – Updated

Thursday, August 4th, 2011

This post is the latest update to a series of blog posts seen on the CalculatedRisk.com blog.  The original blog post of April 12, 2010, is titled “Recession Measures.” In it, Bill discussed key measures that the NBER uses to determine recoveries, and posted four charts.

Here are those charts, updated in his August 2, 2011 post.  The charts are constructed in a fashion different than most – in a “percent of peak” fashion.  As defined, “The following graphs are all constructed as a percent of the peak in each indicator.  This shows when the indicator has bottomed – and when the indicator has returned to the level of the previous peak.  If the indicator is at a new peak, the value is 100%.”  Periods of recession, as defined by the NBER, are shown as blue bars.

Here are the four charts, updated through the dates shown: (click on images to enlarge)

Real Gross Domestic Product, now 0.4% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments, still 5.1% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Industrial Production, still 7.6% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Payroll Employment, still below the pre-recession peak:

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1260.34 as this post is written

Share

“The Reinhart & Rogoff Book” – General Comments

Friday, June 17th, 2011

This Time Is Different (2009) by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff is a widely-quoted and referenced book.  Often it is referred to as “the Reinhart and Rogoff book.”

I find the book to be interesting and unique, although I don’t agree with some of its contents.  From an overall standpoint, perhaps the greatest misgiving I have with regard to the book is the (strong) implication that previous economic episodes are highly relevant to that of today.

With regard to our (putative) current post-financial crisis period, there are a few quotes in the book that are particularly relevant.  The first is found in Chapter 14, page 230, when it says “…the recessions surrounding financial crises are unusually long compared to normal recessions, which typically last less than a year.”  Another quote is seen in Chapter 14, page 235, “It is important to recognize that standard measures of the depth and duration of recessions are not particularly suitable for capturing the epic decline in output that often accompanies deep financial crises.  One factor is the depth of the decline, and another is that growth is sometimes quite modest in the aftermath as the financial system resets.”

I find that many have interpreted the above quotes (and similar findings of the book) with regard to our current economic situation in a rather disconcerting fashion.  Many have interpreted these findings to conclude that since this is the aftermath of a “financial crisis” recovery and growth will be tepid; as such, the lack of recovery / growth that we are now experience is nothing to be unduly concerned about as it is “normal” from a long-term historical standpoint.

I think this viewpoint is a very dangerous one to adopt because it certainly can lull one into a “false sense of security” or otherwise  can breed complacency.

I am of the belief, stated frequently in this blog, that our current economic situation is unique, i.e. not comparable to those in the past.  As such, I am not adopting the aforementioned “don’t be worried, this is normal” mindset as we continually witness various facets of economic weakness and notably odd manifestations of such.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1267.64 as this post is written

Share

“10 Problem Areas” Update

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

On January 10 I wrote, on the Seeking Alpha site, an article titled “10 ‘Front and Center’ Problem Areas That Pose a Threat to the Economy.”

I would like to briefly update my thoughts on these “Problem Areas” as I continue to believe they are very important.

Three factors of the ten seem to be improving, and mildly at that.  These three factors are state finances, unemployment and Ben Bernanke’s demeanor.  All of the others have continued to visibly worsen.

With regard to unemployment, although from an “all things considered” standpoint the situation seems to have perhaps slightly improved, there are still severe problems, as seen both in various unemployment statistics as well as anecdotally.   In this latter category, one sees wildly skewed ratios of job applicants to open positions at job fairs and the like.  Along these lines, it was reported last Thursday that McDonald’s had over 1 million job applicants for the 62,000 jobs it recently took applications for.

With regard to Ben Bernanke’s public demeanor improving,  while this is notable, I certainly wouldn’t assign it as much importance as the other nine factors.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1366.54 as this post is written

Share

Recession Measures – Updated

Monday, February 7th, 2011

This post is the latest update to a series of blog posts seen on the CalculatedRisk.com blog.  The original blog post of April 12, 2010, is titled “Recession Measures.” In it, Bill discussed key measures that the NBER uses to determine recoveries, and posted four charts.

Here are those charts, updated in his February 6, 2011 post.  The charts are constructed in a fashion different than most – in a “percent of peak” fashion.  As defined, “The following graphs are all constructed as a percent of the peak in each indicator. This shows when the indicator has bottomed – and when the indicator has returned to the level of the previous peak. If the indicator is at a new peak, the value is 100%.”  Periods of recession, as defined by the NBER, are shown as blue bars.

Here are the four charts, updated through the dates shown: (click on images to enlarge)

Real Gross Domestic Product, now 0.14% above the pre-recession peak:

-

Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments, still 4.3% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Industrial Production, still 5.8% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Payroll Employment, still 5.6% below the pre-recession peak:

-

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1317.29 as this post is written

Share

Retail Sales Per Capita Adjusted For Inflation

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

On December 14, Doug Short posted to his blog a chart showing retail sales per capita, adjusted for inflation (CPI).  The data is through November, as noted on the chart:

(click on chart to enlarge image)

Of course, this view of total retail sales, on a per-capita (factoring in population growth) basis – as well as adjusted for inflation – is not one that is often seen.  I’ve posted it as I believe that this view is an important one, for many reasons.

_____

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1257.54 as this post is written

Share

Recession Measures – Updated

Monday, November 1st, 2010

On April 21 I wrote a post titled “Recession Measures – Two Charts.”

That post referenced an April 12  CalculatedRisk blog post titled “Recession Measures.” In it, Bill discussed key measures that the NBER uses to determine recoveries, and posted four charts.

Here are those charts, updated in his October 29 post.  The charts are constructed in a fashion different than most – in a “percent of peak” fashion.  As defined, “The following graphs are all constructed as a percent of the peak in each indicator. This shows when the indicator has bottomed – and when the indicator has returned to the level of the previous peak. If the indicator is at a new peak, the value is 100%.”  Periods of recession, as defined by the NBER, are shown as blue bars.

Here are the four charts: (click on images to enlarge)

Real Gross Domestic Product, still 0.8% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments, still 5.5% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Industrial Production, still 7.5% below the pre-recession peak:

-

Payroll Employment, still 5.6% below the pre-recession peak:

_____

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1183.26 as this post is written

Share

Personal Income Less Transfer Payments Chart

Monday, July 26th, 2010

On July 1, 2010 ContraryInvestor.com posted the following chart:

(click on chart to enlarge image)

I find this chart interesting especially given its long-term perspective.

As seen by this measure, the post-2007 experience is (very) atypical…

back to <home>

SPX at 1102.66 as this post is written

Share

Business Roundtable Speech Of June 22, 2010

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

On June 22 Ivan Seidenberg, Chairman of The Business Roundtable, gave a speech (pdf) to the Economic Club of Washington.

Here are some notable speech passages:

“But frankly, we have become somewhat troubled by a growing disconnect between Washington and the business community that is harming our ability to expand the economy and grow private-sector jobs in the U.S. We see a host of laws, regulations and other policies being enacted that impose a government prescription of how individual industries ought to be structured, rather than produce an environment in which the private sector can innovate, invest and create jobs in this modern global economy.”

also:

“In the search for short-term revenue fixes, we’re doing long-term damage to growth.

By reaching into virtually every sector of economic life, government is injecting uncertainty into the marketplace and making it harder to raise capital and create new businesses.”

back to <home>

SPX at 1030.71 as this post is written

Share

Is This A Depression?

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Although almost everyone believes we are in an economic recovery, it behooves us to at least consider whether instead we are in a continuing Depression, as I have previously written.  Beginning on June 22, 2009, I wrote a series of four blog posts that examined various aspects of our economic situation and whether we were in, or heading into, a Depression.

As I wrote on January 19, “Of course, over the last few months there have been signs of economic recovery – or at least a lessening of economic weakness.  However, I believe that these signs represent the type of intermittent economic strength that is often seen during periods of prolonged economic weakness.”

Let’s assume, for a moment, that we are in a continuing Depression, as opposed to an economic recovery as almost everyone believes.  How could virtually everyone be wrong on such a prominent issue?

I believe the answer is complex and lengthy.  However, there are at least three basic underpinnings of such a mistaken belief.

First, judging the sustainability of economic strength after a steep economic decline seems challenging.  During the 1930′s, there were many prominent people who believed that the Depression was over, only to have the economy relapse into further weakness.

Second, since the late 1920s, this country has had very few periods of Depressions or prolonged recessions, as defined.  Due to this lack of “experience,” it may be very difficult to discriminate between continual Depression characteristics, during which intermittent economic strength manifests, and that of a new economic recovery that follows a definite end of economic weakness.  As well – and this is of critical importance – how should government, business and citizens act during a Depression?  Needless to say, how these parties should act during a continual Depression will vary greatly as opposed to that of an economic recovery.   Acting as if one is in a sustainable recovery, when in fact one is in a continuing Depression, would prove devastating.

Third, as I have written of previously, do we, as a nation (and by extension the world) really understand our present economic environment?  We, as a nation, failed (some examples are found here) to predict  the severe economic weakness of late ’08 and early ’09.  Was this failure a “one-time” event – i.e. a fluke not to worry about – or the early “innings” of what will prove to be a colossal, long-running economic misinterpretation?  Before one can flippantly dismiss this concern – as I’m sure most will be tempted to do – one should heed the existence (often mentioned in this blog) of many negative “outliers” during this purported sustainable economic recovery.  Perhaps most noticeable among these outliers is unemployment issues that are proving rather intractable.

Of course, the hope is that we are avoiding a Depression.  However, if we are actually in one, it would strongly behoove us to acknowledge such and act accordingly.

back to <home>

SPX at 1047.61 as this post is written

Share