Archive for September, 2010

The September 2010 Wall Street Journal Economic Forecast Survey

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

I found a few items of interest in the September Wall Street Journal Economic Forecast Survey.

Perhaps the most interesting were the questions asked of the economists, including “Why is the U.S. recovery so disappointingly slow?”

Also, similar to recent surveys in which this double-dip question has been asked, the survey said “The economists on average put a 22% chance on another recession, or double-dip, hitting the U.S. economy in the next 12 months.”

The current average forecasts among economists polled include the following:

Ten-Year Treasury Yield:

for 12/31/2010: 2.9%

for 12/31/2011: 3.78%

CPI:

for 12/1/2010: 1.1%

for 12/1/2011: 1.8%

Unemployment Rate:

for 12/1/2010: 9.6%

for 12/1/2011: 8.9%

Crude Oil  ($ per bbl):

for 12/31/2010: $75.49

for 12/31/2011: $79.99

GDP:

full-year 2010 : 2.5%

full-year 2011 : 2.8%

As compared to last month’s survey, there were various material changes.

(note: I comment upon this survey each month; commentary on past surveys can be found under the “Economic Forecasts” category)

_____

I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this blog are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.

_____

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1121.9 as this post is written

Share

The Importance Of Asset Bubbles

Monday, September 13th, 2010

“When you live in a bubble, everyone is delusional…” -

-Nouriel Roubini, May 11 2010 Charlie Rose interview

Many people fail to see any asset bubbles in our current economic environment.  Others see isolated asset bubbles.  As I have previously stated in the April 8 post,  “Our societal inability to spot and prevent asset bubbles is problematical.”

I have written extensively about the existence of asset bubbles.  The topic is of critical importance as their widespread existence precludes the possibility of Sustainable Prosperity.

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1109.55 as this post is written

Share

Allan Meltzer Comment On “What Should the Federal Reserve Do Next?”

Sunday, September 12th, 2010

On September 9 The Wall Street Journal had various people respond to the question of “What Should the Federal Reserve Do Next?”

Among the various responses, I found this excerpt from Allan Meltzer’s response to be most interesting:

“In “A History of the Federal Reserve,” I concluded that the principal mistakes the Fed has made have resulted from giving excessive attention to current events and forecasts of highly uncertain near-term developments. By focusing on the short-term, the Fed neglects the longer-term consequences of its actions. The transcripts of FOMC show that the members are paying little attention to medium- and longer-term consequences.”

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1109.55 as this post is written

Share

An Interesting Perspective On The Chicago Fed National Activity Index

Friday, September 10th, 2010

I have mentioned The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) in a variety of posts, first in a March 30 post and then in the monthly Updates on Economic Indicators.

I view the CFNAI (which is usually expressed via a 3-month moving average denoted CFNAI-3) as being among the most valuable of commonly referenced official (i.e. government produced) indicators.

On September 7, Doug Short posted this annotated chart of the CFNAI-3 from Bob Bronson, along with associated commentary:

(click on chart to enlarge)

I find this interpretation of CFNAI-3 to be very interesting.   I think the main value in it is from a long-term perspective.  Although the regression (red arrow) shows only a gradual decline, the more ominous trend appears to be from (roughly) the post-2000 period.

It should be interesting to see how the CFNAI-3 performs on a going-forward basis…

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1107.57 as this post is written

Share

A Brazen Ponzi Scheme

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

Bloomberg BusinessWeek had a story on September 2 titled “Wayne McLeod:  The Life and Death of a Mini-Madoff.”

This Ponzi scheme was particularly brazen as it targeted federal law enforcement personnel.

The story is an interesting one.  I would slightly disagree with one statement in the article, “As primitive as they are, Ponzi schemes are not easy to spot.”  I would say that some Ponzi schemes are more obvious than others; as well, I wouldn’t classify Ponzi schemes as “primitive.”

I have previously written a few posts on investment frauds and Ponzi schemes, as I believe that this is a topic that has important implications for both investors and capital markets.

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1098.87 as this post is written

Share

Christina Romer’s September 1 Speech

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

On September 1, Christina Romer gave a speech titled “Not My Father’s Recession:  The Extraordinary Challenges and Policy Responses of the First Twenty Months of the Obama Administration.” (pdf)

The main reason I highlight this report is for reference purposes, as I may comment upon it in the future.

As those familiar with this blog know, I vehemently disagree with many of her interpretations and conclusions.

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1091.84 as this post is written

Share

Premium Pricing Strategies And The Economy

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

(This is my second blog post that solely discusses pricing issues.  My first was on April 23, 2010)

Firms in general have enjoyed the economic “tailwind” of rising sales for decades.  While this can be seen in a variety of measures, one of particular note is that of Retail Sales.  As seen in the following chart (from the CalculatedRisk blog of 8-13-10) Retail Sales have proven robust and (relatively) resilient, with latter-2008 being the brief major exception:

(click on chart for larger image)

Despite this “tailwind”, problems appear to be increasing especially in the area of pricing.  An August 19 Wall Street Journal article discussed pricing issues at P&G.  One part of the article was particularly noteworthy, discussing P&G’s strategy of offering premium products:

“But the long recession and creaking recovery have undermined that strategy. Consumers might be willing to shell out for iPads, but their day-to-day spending reflects an entrenched frugality that often means leaving P&G’s relatively expensive products on the shelf. Nearly two-thirds of U.S. consumers said they switched to a cheaper substitute for at least one basic household product, food or beverage in the past year, according to a Sanford Bernstein survey of 834 consumers. More than three-quarters said they believe less expensive products were as good as or better than those they replaced.

In response to the changing U.S. market, the company is doing the once unthinkable—slashing prices…”

P&G’s situation does not seem unique, given the existence of widespread discounting and promotions despite resilient overall retail sales figures.  Given this dynamic, one question that arises is whether we are now starting to experience a (downward) revaluation in product differentiation?  In essence, is product differentiation generally losing its ability to attract sales at higher prices?  If so, the implications are immense, especially for those firms that are “Premium Pricers.”

This issue is but one of many complex pricing issues now facing companies.  While it is of course difficult to generalize across all firms due to their various characteristics, the following five issues appear to be of primary significance:

First, how will those companies whose focus is offering premium products (and services) fare should the economy materially weaken (as I expect) from here?

Second, if one assumes that product differentiation is generally losing value (i.e. its ability to generate revenues at sufficiently higher prices), can “Premium Pricers” successfully adapt?  How might this be done?

Third, are products and services now considered “staples” (i.e. necessary in nature) changing to more “discretionary” in nature?  How will this impact firms?

Fourth, how will cost structures change should significant economic weakness reassert itself?

Fifth, are Pricing actions now being taken to attract sales (including discounting and promotions) undermining firms’ future pricing power?  In other words, to what extent will current pricing actions undermine the future success of firms?

In the July 9 post, I wrote “I believe that many firms will continue to face very challenging conditions…”  This belief is based upon a number of factors.  However, firms’ ability to successfully manage Pricing given the overall increasing complexity is a key reason for this belief.   On an “all things considered basis”  many firms do not appear to be successfully adapting to this new Pricing complexity.  This will prove especially problematical in a significantly weaker economic environment.

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here

SPX at 1104.51 as this post is written

Share