I found this story in The Washington Post, from June 11, to be rather interesting:
“Lawmakers Invested in Bailed-Out Firms” :
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/10/AR2009061002565.html?wpisrc=newsletter
I would have assumed there are rules that expressly prohibit such a conflict of interest. If not, perhaps a recusal would be appropriate?
SPX at 918.90 as this post is written
This entry was posted
on Monday, June 29th, 2009 at 6:07 am and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
